Whatever you want to say about the cross, it is not a religious symbol.
At least it wasn’t intended to be.
The cross was not designed to give us warm fuzzies about religion…or make us feel better about ourselves…or be used as a religious symbol to ward off evil…or even worn as a golden piece of jewelry.
The true nature of the cross is a skandalon (Galatians 5:11)…a scandal…an offense…a stumbling block…because it contradicts everything we think we know about religion…about God…about ourselves.
At the most fundamental level–and this can’t be emphasized too strongly–the cross is in no way “religious.” The cross is by a very long way the most irreligious object to ever find its way into the heart of faith. J. Christiaan Becker refers to it as “this most nonreligious and horrendous feature of the Gospel.” The crucifixion marks out the essential distinction between Christianity and “religion.” …The cross is “irreligious” because no human being individually or human beings collectively would have projected their hopes, wishes, longings, and needs onto a crucified man. (Fleming Rutledge)
We have sanitized the cross too much.
As a means of execution, crucifixion was designed not only to prolong physical pain and suffering as long as possible, but it was also designed to degrade and dehumanize its victims to the lowest possible degree.
It was reserved for the lowest of all humans.
It was reserved for the dregs of society.
No Roman citizen could be crucified…only slaves and those with absolutely no social standing.
It was the ultimate pronouncement for all the world to see…”This man is utterly worthless. Only worthy of scorn and derision.”
In theory, Christ could have died in another way. He came as the Lamb of God to die as our substitute. The Old Testament sacrifices were killed quickly and without undue suffering. It was their blood that provided the cleansing for one’s sin…their death that provided the substitute for one’s life.
Yet Christ chose to be crucified.
Let this mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus,
Who, being in the form of God,
Did not consider it robbery to be equal with God,
But made Himself of no reputation,
Taking the form of a bondservant,
Coming in the likeness of men.
And being found in appearance as a man,
He humbled Himself and became obedient to the point of death,
Even the death of the cross. (Philippians 2:5-8)
Why?
Crucifixion represented humanity at its worst…humanity not only executing someone but rendering a judgment on their worth as a human being…not only killing them but making them suffer in every way imaginable.
Crucifixion as a means of execution in the Roman Empire had as its express purpose the elimination of the victims from consideration as members of the human race. It cannot be said too strongly: that was its function. …Crucified persons were not of the same species as either the executioners or the spectators and were therefore not only expendable but also deserving of ritualized extermination. …The specific role of the passersby was to exacerbate the dehumanization and degradation of the person who had been thus designated to be a spectacle. Crucifixion was cleverly designed–we might say diabolically designed–to be an almost theatrical enactment of the sadistic and inhumane impulses that lie within human beings. (Fleming Rutledge)
Even in the Jewish mindset, to be hung on a tree…to have one’s death displayed as an advertisement of execution…was the ultimate sign of being a cursed individual…unworthy of life…unworthy of even a proper death.
Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us, for it is written: “Cursed is everyone who is hung on a tree.” (Galatians 3:13).
The depravity of humanity…the cruelty of degradation…the judgmental hatred of the human heart…the curse of sin…the shame of iniquity…the excruciating pain of suffering…the sting of death…were all wrapped together in the crucifixion of Christ.
The worst that sin can be is shown on the cross.
The worst that humanity can be is shown on the cross.
That is why seeing the cross as a “religious symbol” does a disservice to its true intent.
It was meant to cause revulsion not devotion.
It was meant to display a curse not a blessing.
It was meant for the lowest of all possible human beings…not even worthy of being called a human…not a hero, not a savior, not a messiah, not a king.
God, in the person of his sinless Son, put himself voluntarily and deliberately into the condition of greatest accursedness–on our behalf and in our place. This mind-crunching paradox lies at the heart of the Christian message. (Fleming Rutledge)
God entered our world and we crucified Him.
The cross is not a religious symbol. It is a declaration that we do not need God…that we do not want Him…that we want to figure out life on our own…that we love our independence too much to bow to our Creator.
And remarkably…unfathomably…God allowed Himself to be crucified by us…in order to die for us.
God took all our sin…all our curse…all our shame…all our suffering…all our death…in order to give us His righteousness…His blessing…His glory…His peace…His life.
The enormity of sin and the incomprehensibility of grace intersect at the cross.
For He [God] made Him [Jesus] who knew no sin to be sin for us, that we might become the righteousness of God in Him (2 Corinthians 5:21).
God loved you at your worst.
God sought you when you least deserved it.
God bore all your sin.
God endured all your shame.
God suffered all your pain.
God became your curse.
God died your death.
To make you His own.
To make you new.
That is not religion…that is redemption.
And that is the message of the cross.
And I pray that you, being rooted and established in love, may have power, together with all the Lord’s holy people, to grasp how wide and long and high and deep is the love of Christ, and to know this love that surpasses knowledge—that you may be filled to the measure of all the fullness of God (Ephesians 3:17b-19).