The Secret Thoughts of an Unlikely Convert

Rosaria Champagne Butterfield's book, The Secret Thoughts of an Unlikely Convert: an English Professor's Journey into the Christian Faith, was mentioned in a blog. It sounded interesting to me so I ordered it.

I read it in one day. 

I would have to rate her book as one of the best books I have read in the past few years….one, because it is always awesome to read a compelling life story…two, because Rosaria's story is so relevant in today's culture…and three, because her stark honesty and simple testimony challenged me in so many areas of my own life. 

Rosaria, aka Dr. Champagne, was a professor of English Literature at Syracuse University, a teacher in the Center for Women's Studies, and an avowed lesbian activist. She ridiculed…and feared Christianity…at the same time. 

Her book provided an inside look on how those in the LGBT community view most Christians. 

Christians always seemed like bad thinkers to me. It seemed that they could  maintain their worldview only because they were sheltered from the world's real problems…. Christians always seemed like bad readers to me, too. They appeared to use the Bible in a way that Marxists would call "vulgar"–that is, common, or, in order to bring the Bible into a conversation to stop the conversion, not deepen it. "The Bible says" always seemed to me like a mantra that invited everyone to put his or her brain on hold. "The Bible says" was the Big Pause before the conversation stopped. (4)

Too often the church does not know how to interface with university culture because it comes to the table only ready to moralize and not dialogue. There is a core difference between sharing the gospel with the lost and imposing a specific moral standard on the unconverted. (7)

Dr. Champagne's mind began to change with a simple letter. She had attacked the traditional view of the family in a local newspaper and had received a mountain of mail which she could easily categorize as "fan mail" or "hate mail." But one letter defied categorization. It was written by a local pastor, Ken Smith, who simply and graciously challenged her presuppositions.

"It was the kindest letter of opposition that I had ever received" (9). 

Out of curiosity, Dr. Champagne called the pastor. After a nice chat, the pastor invited her for a home-cooked dinner with him and his wife. She accepted. And thus began a friendship and a conversation that would lead Dr. Champagne down a road that she didn't anticipate. A road that led to a "train wreck" in her life as the foundations of her thinking and identity were kindly confronted. 

Later, Dr. Champagne would reflect on this time in her life in a speech given at Syracuse University to incoming graduate students. It was a time when she was not only talking to Pastor Smith but also doing research for her second book. 

I was studying the Religious Right from the lesbian feminist perspective of the secular left, and aside from discovering what I already knew, that the Religious Right was manipulating religious commitments in the name of capitalist consumerism and conservative political agendas, I discovered something else, something that I wasn't looking for, and something that changed my life–not to mention my research–from the ground up. I discovered that God isn't just a narrative we pick like summer berries or leave for the next person; nor is God a set of social conventions tailored for the weak of mind; nor is God a consumerist social construct who exists in the service of Christian imperialist ideologies and right-wing politics. Rather, I discovered that God through Jesus Christ exists, the triune God of the Bible exists, whether we acknowledge him or not. I discovered that God wasn't very happy with me.  (46-47)

As Rosaria began to read and hear God's Word, she was "forced to see pride and not sexual orientation as the root sin." 

The truth is, outside of Christ, I am a manipulator, liar, power-monger, and controller. In my relationships with men and with women, I had to be in charge. (32)

The Christian life is a life imbued with the supernatural power and authority of God. God is the God of salvation. We do not control God by saying magic words or attending church. Conversion is a heart-affair. Before we can come to Christ, we must empty ourselves of the false pride, blame-shifting, excuse-making, and self-deception that preoccupies our days and our relationships. Before we can come to Christ, we must come to ourselves. (36-37)

Conversion put me in a complicated and comprehensive chaos. I sometimes wonder, when I hear other Christians pray for the salvation of the "lost," if they realize that this comprehensive chaos is the desired end of such prayers. Often, people asked me to describe the "lessons" that I learned from this experience. I can't. It was too traumatic. Sometimes in crisis, we don't really learn lessons. Sometimes the result is simpler and more profound: sometimes our character is simply transformed. (27)

Rosaria's conversion to Christ put her personal and professional life in a tailspin. Her friends couldn't understand her "newfound faith" and at times tried to draw her back into her old life. Her university didn't quite know what to do her though her classes began to be packed with interested students. And her new church didn't quite know how to walk her through all the challenges that she would face on a daily basis. Perhaps the church's biggest mistake was encouraging her toward a heterosexual marriage way too soon after her conversion. Her words on this were powerful and direct…and a warning that all of us need to hear and share, especially in our present culture.

What good Christians don't realize is that sexual sin is not recreational sex gone overboard. Sexual sin is predatory. It won't be "healed" by redeeming the context of the genders. Sexual sin must simply be killed. What is left of your sexuality after this annihilation is  up to God. But healing, to the sexual sinner, is death: nothing more and nothing less. …Too many young Christian fornicators plan that marriage will redeem their sin. Too many young Christian masturbators plan that marriage will redeem their patterns. Too many young Christian internet pornographers think that having legitimate sex will take away the desire to have illicit sex. They're wrong. And the marriages that result from this line of thinking are dangerous places. I know why over 50% of Christian marriages end in divorce: because Christians act as though marriage redeems sin. Marriage does not redeem sin. Only Jesus himself can do that. (83)

There is so much more in her book that convicted me, encouraged me, and challenged the way that I think and live as a Christian. How do you stand for the sanctity of marriage in a culture increasingly committed to sexual freedom? How do you stand for biblical truth while showing compassionate love at the same time? It seems like an impossible task. Most Christians drift toward one side or the other–either watering down the Bible's clear standards on sexuality in the name of love or preaching down at those in sexual sin in the name of truth. It is a walk on a tightrope between love and truth, between mercy and righteousness, between unconditional kindness and uncompromising boldness. The balancing act between doing justly and loving mercy is only found in walking humbly with your God (Micah 6:8). 

Today, Rosaria Champagne Butterfield is married to a Reformed Presbyterian pastor in North Carolina. They have several adopted foster children that Rosaria homeschools in classical education. 

I am sure if I met Rosaria today, I would have no idea of the past that she has come from.

I guess that is true of everyone that I meet. 

Maybe that's why God calls me to walk in humilty, speak with grace, and focus on the gospel of Jesus Christ. Because I never know if I am in the company of someone who will be the unlikeliest of converts.

Posted in Recommended Books | Leave a comment

Why I Still Care about Tim Tebow

A year and a half ago I wrote a post about Tim Tebow (see https://heelcatcher.com/?p=602). It was in the height of his improbable run of leading the Denver Broncos into the playoffs…despite putting up awful stats as a quarterback and generally waiting until the last two minutes of the 4th quarter to play well. It was a fun ride and Tebow became a phenomenom and a pariah both at the same time.

Since then, Tebow has been wished sayonara by the Broncos (who never really wanted him as a QB), languished through an abysmal year with the Jets (who never really knew why they had him), and been passed over by every other team in the NFL (who never really thought he belonged in the NFL to begin with). 

Until Belichick and the New England Patriots picked him up on a no guarantee, two-year contract this past week.

Tebow is back on the NFL radar and all over the Twitter world…though many would say that he never really left it. 

I was excited to hear the news that the Patriots had picked him up. I was hoping that he would get another chance to play in the NFL. I figured Jacksonville would be the first to pick him up when he was released. It seemed like a no brainer to me. If the goal of an NFL team (at least in the business sense) is to sell tickets, then Tebow would be an immediate draw to a mediocre franchise. What would be the harm of giving the "Tebow experiment" a year to work? Jacksonville isn't wowing anyone on the field right now and their current QB isn't that exciting to the Jacksonville fan base. C'mon, would you be more likely to watch a Jacksonville game if Tebow was QBing or Blaine Gabbert was? If Tebow didn't work out, then everyone would know it. If he did, then Jacksonville would not only be successful in the ticket office but in the win column as well. But Jacksonville, which is sort of like the neglected little step-child of the NFL, apparently didn't want to appear to be desperate or out of step with the other teams in the league. Why risk being the laughingstock of the league when you are already snickered at as a franchise?

So many thought that Tebow's only real hope was the Patriots. Belichick could keep the media circus in line. Josh McDaniels, who was the only one who really believed in Tebow on draft day, is on the Patriots' staff. And the starting QB, Tom Brady, is so solidly entrenched that no QB controversy could feasibily develop. But the Patriots didn't seem interested.

Until now. 

After the Patriots picked Tebow up, I read some of the comments by sportswriters. Most thought that Belichick was arrogant or just plain stupid. Few saw any value in Tebow. Many used the opportunity to again blast the man they love to blast. "He can't play QB." "His mechanics are terrible." "Welcome to the circus." "Dumb, dumb, dumb, dumb, dumb…." 

Why all the fascination, fuming, and fuss over Tebow?

I am a Tebow fan. I guess I am one of the "crazies" that sportswriters like to lampoon. But I don't like Tebow because I think he is the next Peyton Manning. Hey, Denver is much better off with Peyton at the helm. I don't know a lot about QB mechanics and so who I am to say whether Tebow can make it in the NFL? Maybe he can't. Maybe all the naysayers will be proved right. That's okay. Football to me is just entertainment. It is not life or death (despite what many fans think). It is a game. A fun game. A lucrative game. But a game nonetheless. 

I like Tebow because I respect him. I admire his Christian faith. I think he is a young man of integrity. I think he is a hard worker, an authentic individual, a good athlete, and a person with a genuine desire to use his influence and affluence to encourage others, help the needy, and share the good news of Jesus Christ. I like Tebow because he is someone that I would gladly have my four boys look up to and emulate. That can't be said about a lot of sports stars. So for that reason, I would love to see him succeed. 

So for the life of me, I can't understand why people seem to hate him so much…and want him to fail. Maybe he gets too much attention. Sportswriters like to blame Tebow fans for keeping him on the radar…but Tebow fans aren't the ones who keep writing sports columns about him and featuring him on ESPN. Maybe his fans are too devoted to him. That's possible but not really new or unusual in the sports world. How can fans of sports athletes decry other fans of sports athletes for being fans of sports athletes? "Well, Tebow hasn't done enough to deserve it." I don't know. Two national collegiate championships and a Heisman Trophy aren't too shabby. And despite poor statistics, he actually has done remarkably well as a starting NFL QB…at least in the wins and "intangibles" categories. 

No, Tebow seems to inspire disdain and disgust for some other reason. Maybe he is "too good" as a role model. Maybe he's the good kid that always gets A's in the class and so the other kids in the class start wanting him to fail. Maybe people see him as a fake because he smiles too much. Maybe people have lingering loatheful feelings from his days as a Florida Gator. Maybe people hate second and third string QB's with bad mechanics. Maybe some hate Tebow because he represents what our society can no longer seem to understand or tolerate–a commitment to sexual purity and an unabashed devotion to Jesus Christ as his Savior. 

I don't know.   

But I do know if Tebow makes the cut and plays this year in the NFL, then I will say something that I don't think I have ever said before.

"Go Patriots!"

Posted in Random Thoughts | 2 Comments

Pride in the Pews

10 Now I plead with you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you all speak the same thing, and that there be no divisions among you, but that you be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment. 11 For it has been declared to me concerning you, my brethren, by those of Chloe’s household, that there are contentions among you. 12 Now I say this, that each of you says, “I am of Paul,” or “I am of Apollos,” or “I am of Cephas,” or “I am of Christ.” 13 Is Christ divided? Was Paul crucified for you? Or were you baptized in the name of Paul?
 
14 I thank God that I baptized none of you except Crispus and Gaius, 15 lest anyone should say that I had baptized in my own name. 16 Yes, I also baptized the household of Stephanas. Besides, I do not know whether I baptized any other. 17 For Christ did not send me to baptize, but to preach the gospel, not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of no effect. (1 Corinthians 1:10-17)
 
It is sometimes funny to me when people talk about becoming like the early church. Yes, there were some major positives in the early church that we should emulate and some great examples that we should follow, but the early church had problems just like the church today. The battle with the sinful nature was around then and it is still alive today. 
 
After thanking God for His work of salvation in the believers at Corinth, Paul immediately makes his heartfelt appeal to the Corinthians…Be unified! 
 
The Corinthian church thought it was spiritual, mature, and the best church in the area. But Paul had a different opinion. Their pride, puffed up views, and petty disputes with one another proved their immaturity.
 
As I read this passage this morning, I was drawn to Paul's appeal. I plead with you… I pictured a father with his children, "Please, stop. Can't you get along? Are you really fighting over such pointless things? Can't you learn to speak encouragement to one another instead of always tearing each other down?" 
 
It still boggles my mind how people would rather be right about their opinions and miserable than to swallow their pride and seek reconciliation and peace. But then I stop and realize how hard it is for me to admit that I am wrong, to take a rebuke, to say that I am sorry, to stop talking long enough to listen to someone else. Ouch!
 
Now I am sure the Corinthians thought they were arguing over important things. 
 
I am of Paul, the apostle to the Gentiles. 
 
Well, I am of Apollos, the great orator of truth. 
 
Gimme a break, I am of Cephas, the disciple who walked with the Lord. 
 
You are all so childish, I am the one who is truly following Christ.
 
But in Paul's assessment, it was all puffed up pride. The key word in all those statements is the word "I." It stands at the forefront of immaturity and at the center of pride and sin. When we start spouting out our opinions as if they are the standard and the measure by which others should be measured, then we need to stop and check our heart.
 
God throws different people together in a family…and in a church…to teach us how to humble ourselves and to learn how to love. 
 
Lord, deliver me from me. 
Posted in 1 Corinthians | Leave a comment

Grace and Peace

Every letter of Paul begins with the same blessing. "Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ" (Rom 1:7, 1 Cor. 1:2, 2 Cor 1:2, Gal. 1:3, Eph. 1:2, Phil 1:2, Col 1:2, 1 Th 1:1, 2 Th 1:2, 1 Tim 1:2, 2 Tim. 1:2, Titus 1:4, Phile. 1:3).

The traditional greeting in the ancient Roman empire was "Greetings!" (charein). Paul adapted that greeting and instead said "Grace (charis) to you" and then brought in the Jewish greeting of "peace" (Hebrew, shalom). 

Grace and peace. The two must go together. 
 
Grace is God's activity toward us. God's good, unmerited, merciful, bountiful love. We do not deserve anything but God has given us everything in Jesus Christ. Everything we have is a gift. Stop and consider that, from an eternal perspective, nothing that you have is "earned." Every breath and every heart beat is a gift. 
 
Peace is our experience within God's grace. It is contentment, blessing, joy, satisfaction under the Shepherd's care. It is shalom, wholeness, well-being, rest. It is coming to the place of surrender. It is quieting one's soul in the Father's arms. 
 
These two things were not just a slogan to Paul but his whole theology…and his prayer and desire for himself and for those he ministered to.
 
May you come to know more and more of God's grace.
 
May you experience more and more of God's peace.
 
And may you realize more and more that both are only found through Jesus Christ.
Posted in 1 Corinthians | Leave a comment

The Message of Pi

Stuck on a airplane for nine hours gives you a chance to watch some of the current movies out there….assuming you can find something halfway decent. I watched Skyfall and wasn't impressed. Was there actually a plot in that movie? It had no suspense, no surprises, no real story. But I guess if you shoot at things, get shot, blow things up, get the girl (and then another one), and look manly through it all then you have enough for another James Bond movie. It wasn't for me.

The only other movie that looked interesting was the Life of Pi. I had heard about it but I wasn't too tempted to go to the movies and watch it for $10…or even go to a Redbox and rent it for $1.29. It seemed a little weird from what I saw. But hey, it was free on the plane and I had time. So I hit "play."

I was pleasantly surprised.

It was a great story with a mix of humor, suspense, and vivid visual effects. The plot was so unique–a boy stuck on a lifeboat with a hyena, zebra, orangutan, and Bengal tiger–that it was hard not to be drawn in. And as an added bonus, it was clean and avoided needless vulgarity.

But after watching the movie…and thoroughly enjoying it…I had to stop and think about its message. The Life of Pi preaches a message that resonates with much of our culture today. But is it true?

The movie begins with a young writer visiting Pi because he hears that Pi has a story that "will make him believe in God." The young man is eager to hear the story. So a middle-aged Pi begins to tell it. (And if you haven't seen the movie, then you may want to stop here and go watch it first.)

Pi grows up in India with a sharp, curious mind and a receptive, spiritual heart. His dad owns a zoo which adds to Pi's young adventures and the beauty of his childhood. There is an innocence to Pi that is refreshing. For instance, deep down, Pi feels he can befriend the zoo's Bengal tiger. His father has to show him the the ferociousness of the tiger…and the harsh reality of life…in order to preserve his son from his own naivete. 

But Pi is undeterred in his innocent optimism…especially in the spiritual realm. He embraces Hinduism and its cultural story. Then he embraces Christianity and its story of God's love. Then he embraces Islam and its discipline and devotion. His father jokes that if Pi can embrace a few more religions then he can live his whole life on holiday. 

Instead of religion, Pi's dad pushes him toward reason and a rationalistic view of the universe. Only science gives practical answers to life's problems. Science operates in reality; religion in fantasy. And you have to choose in which realm you will live. 

The background is set. And now the real story begins.

Due to circumstances and failing finances, Pi's family sets sail on a boat toward Canada. His dad brings the animals of the zoo to sell for income. Along the way, the boat sinks in the midst of a violent storm. Through the course of events that are too hard to explain, Pi ends up as the only survivor in a lifeboat with a wounded zebra, a tired baboon, a hungry hyena, and the aforementioned Bengal tiger. And before long, all that are left are Pi and the tiger.

The next 227 days on the lifeboat are an adventure to say the least. Deeply inspiring, wildly compelling, and rationally unbelievable.

In the end, Pi ends up half-dead on a beach in Mexico. The tiger, gaunt, bedraggled, and now befriended to Pi, disappears into the Mexican jungle before help arrives.

Pi is rescued alone.

In the hospital recovering, Pi is visited by representatives of the boat company looking to write a report on the vessel's sinking. Pi tells the story of the animals on the lifeboat but the representatives seem unable to accept it. It is simply beyond belief. So, to satisfy them, Pi tells another story, replacing the animals with human characters, and changing the wildness of the story into something easier to explain…and to believe. The representatives seem satisfied and leave.

The scene pans back to Pi talking with the young writer. "I have told you two different stories. Same basic facts. Same ending. Which do you believe?"

The writer replies, "The story with the tiger because it is the better story." 

Pi says. "And so it is with God." 

The writer wryly smiles. Now he understands. There are two ways of looking at the universe. Both must deal with the reality of what we see. We can either believe the rationality of science or accept the unbelievable wonder of spirituality. Pi, and now the writer, take the route of spirituality because it makes the "better story."

While the credits were rolling, I paused to think about the message of the movie.

On the surface, it seems pretty good. Through Pi's story, the young writer moved from doubtful atheism to hopeful theism. That sounds like movement in the right direction, doesn't it? There is much to like about the Life of Pi.

But then I thought a little more. Is faith merely picking the "better story"? 

If so, then it really doesn't matter what you believe. Simply look for what interests you, what makes you feel inspired, what "works" for you. This is the route that Pi has taken. He embraces all religions because they simply enhance the "story." Reality is mystery. Unknowable. Unfathomable. Unattainable. So look at the facts of reality and choose to see a better story. Whatever that might be. Take your choice among the world religions. Or take them all. Or invent your own for that matter. 

It's the ultimate postmodern dream. Construct your own reality. Choose your own belief. Write your own story. 

But in the end, the fact remains. Either Pi was on the boat with a bunch of animals or he wasn't. Reality is reality. Anything else is delusion. Even if it is the "better story." 

Either we live in a random universe with no meaning or there is a God who has created. Either the Bible tells the historical story of redemption or it is a fanciful myth. Either Christ lived, died, and rose from the dead or He didn't.

Christianity doesn't allow itself to be one of many perspectives. It claims to be reality. And its Savior claims to be the creator God…in human flesh…the only Conqueror of sin and death…in real space-time history.

Yes, faith enters the equation. We can't know all things. We have to trust some authority. We have to be willing to believe. But ultimately true faith must be tied to evidence, to truth, to reality. Otherwise, it is not faith but fantasy.

Even if it is the "better story."

Posted in Random Thoughts | 1 Comment